Linking Pathways from Perceived Absolute Risk and Social Support to Female Regular Health Screening: Integrated with Social Cognitive Theory Model

Authors

Keywords:

Social Cognitive Theory, perceived absolute risk, self-efficacy, self-regulation, social support, female health regular screening

Abstract

The increasing incidence of cancer among women of childbearing age has emerged as a significant health crisis, necessitating urgent attention from both individuals and societal medical systems. Cancer-related screening and prevention strategies are prevalent public health responses to this challenge. This study integrates the Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) with the Health Belief Model (HBM) and Self-Determination Theory (SDT) to examine the psychological and behavioral factors influencing health outcomes. Specifically, it investigates how perceived absolute risk, self-efficacy, self-regulation, social support, and health screening behaviors interrelate, focusing on their mutual reinforcement in the context of female health regulation. Addressing a gap in existing research on health behavior change in a sustainable loop, this study employs a nationally representative online survey with 904 female participants. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), revealing that the integrated model exhibited a good fit and that all five hypotheses were supported. The findings emphasizing the importance of psychological and behavioral impacts on public health behaviors.

 

Author Biographies

Huiwen Sun, School of Communication and Culture, Royal Roads University

School of Communication and Culture, Royal Roads University, Canada

Zhenyi Li, School of Communication and Culture, Royal Roads University

School of Communication and Culture, Royal Roads University, Canada

Published

2025-01-01

How to Cite

Sun, H., & Li, Z. (2025). Linking Pathways from Perceived Absolute Risk and Social Support to Female Regular Health Screening: Integrated with Social Cognitive Theory Model. The Journal of Medicine, Humanity and Media, 3(1), 37–51. Retrieved from http://mhmjournal.net/index.php/mhm/article/view/94